Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts
115

The Ongoing Witch Hunt Against Dr. Richard Stallman, Some Considerations on Leadership and Free Speech

115

The Ongoing Witch Hunt Against Dr. Richard Stallman, Some Considerations on Leadership and Free Speech

397 comments
68% Upvoted
What are your thoughts? Log in or Sign uplog insign up
level 1
Moderator of r/StallmanWasRight, speaking officiallyScore hidden · 2 days ago · Stickied comment

Please report problematic comments.

3 more replies

level 1
-9 points · 2 days ago(More than 5 children)
level 2
Original Poster5 points · 2 days ago · edited 2 days ago

He needs to be punished. He is being rightly punished.

Yeah, he needs to be punished but only in an ideal world where the rest of the world is filled with holy saints who've committed no wrongs. When we have a POTUS like Donald Trump and a judge like Kavanaugh who brush aside actual allegations of sexual misconducts, not just have opinions about it, you need to have practical considerations of whom to punish and stop nitpicking on everything.

It depends on you really, do you want to be led by a thick skinned guy like Trump or a morally sensitive guy like Dr. Stallman? The actions you take will determine the leaders your country will get.

level 2
16 points · 2 days ago · edited 2 days ago

He is losing his mental faculties and has come out in support of a complete insane proposition.

Just a point of disagreement. This isn't him losing his mental faculties. He's always been like that. He has Vulcan-way of approaching problems and reasoning. He was always oblivious to social convention.

Just scroll through his site (stallman.org) and you can see that. His resignation note[1] also exemplifies this.

It wasn't him that changed. He's the same old Stallman that he has always been. It's just that now tech is big business (so no more room for unrefined dinosaurs), and we live in a much more puritan time.

[1] https://www.stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#16_September_2019_(Resignation)

level 2
-2 points · 2 days ago

You are talking about that right now and are not being punished. You should, right?

level 2
17 points · 2 days ago

Freedom of speech is a philosophical concept. Why do people think the world began in 1776?

level 1

I deeply respect what Stallman has done for the software community, and his commitment to freedom. But can we please not pretend this is some baseless hit-piece against him? He's come right out and said that he thinks a pedophile's victim was most likely willing. If there's any speech at all that should come with serious social consequences, it's defending child rapists.

level 2
36 points · 2 days ago

He actually said that the most likely scenario was that Epstein told her to pretend to be willing, in order to make Minsky believe that she was willing.

level 2

Fuck off with that bullshit. Go read the emails. He never said that. You're repeating rumors and headlines without actually checking the facts.

level 2
9 points · 2 days ago · edited 2 days ago

Stallman is a relic from another era when computing was a niche industry. Computing isn't a niche industry anymore. There is no place for unrefined dinosaurs like him in tech anymore. We're going to get exactly what we're asking for: slick, inoffensive politicians that run foundations like FSF - who can talk a lot but say nothing and offend noone, attend all the best high-society parties, and raise big corporate money for the foundation. You'll never see those guys play the "bongos" for Open Source Free Software: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw

The change was going to happen but I'm going to miss the old days.

level 2
1 point · 2 days ago

But

Nothing someone says before the word but really counts

level 2
Comment removed by moderator2 days ago
level 1
83 points · 2 days ago

This is a really poor article. It doesn't even attempt to address the criticism aimed at RMS and just spends its entire length uncritically shilling for him. Supporting free speech and free software doesn't mean defending his shitty opinions.

Also, the author is clearly incapable of understanding what the term "free speech" means, because it definitely doesn't mean "ability to say anything you want with zero ramifications".

level 2

agreed awful article. he makes the point that trump isn't phased by sexual assault accusations against him because he has "thicker skin than that", as if it's a good thing to not have people forced out of positions of power for being rapists. if Stallman was accused of the same stuff as trump I'd hope he'd be held liable.

level 2
-12 points · 2 days ago(More than 1 child)
level 2
-17 points · 2 days ago(More than 1 child)
level 1

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

 If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / ^Contact)

level 1

That is an insightful article thank you.

level 1

Remember how they came for Torvalds not that long ago? Now Stallman.


And all of a sudden M$ releasing it M$ Core system based on Linux Kernel. Embrace - Extend - Extinguish.

level 2
Original Poster15 points · 2 days ago

Yes, even Guido was targeted around the same time as Torvalds but I don't think this has anything to do with Microsoft. This is just the internet mob justice at work smearing a guy's lifetime of achievements.

More posts from the StallmanWasRight community
Continue browsing in r/StallmanWasRight

30.4k

Members

58

Online

Nobody listens to him. But he was right all along.